Great Construction

Divine Spiritual Science Is
a Democratic Healing Method

     People do not seem to realize that contemporary medicine is highly discriminatory and most undemocratic. The poor are not able to afford expensive medicines and it is impossible for them to be admitted to hospitals. Neither does the economic burden allow them to continue long periods of recuperative treatment, so there is no way that equality of opportunity in medical recovery can be obtained. To make up for these defects, the government has set up a national health insurance system, but the system does not appear to perform as expected. We often hear that insurance-sponsored patients get inferior treatment from the doctors compared to that received by their patients who pay entirely in cash. This problem results in the rather ridiculous situation where the insured pretend to be uninsured cash-paying patients and pay the fees anyway. It can be said that the current medical system is indeed far from being democratic. However, this situation may be unavoidable due to economic conditions in contemporary society, as it appears that ways to improve the situation cannot be found.
     In our spiritual therapy, however, there is no discrimination between those who have money and those who do not. For one thing, no materials of any kind are used. The therapy is an activity of invisible spirit, that is, a light wave radiated from the body of one person to that of another. Since our therapy has presented with results many times over those of medical treatment, ours should be called quite ideal.
     Our healing method can be said to be literally a democratic healing art.
     Recently in the Mainichi newspaper, the head of the Japan Medical Association, Dr. Sekizen Furuhata was reported as saying,
     “When we have a patient who pays cash, we discuss the individual’s finances and then treat. If the patient has only a little bit of money, we inject something, but even in cases where patients really need injections, there are many cases where because of their financial condition, we cannot. In a few such cases, the attitude that the doctor has to take is simple because it is decided unfortunately by the patient, and the situations go to extremes.
     “Even in the type of unrestricted medical diagnosis and treatment that has been practiced until now, there were actual instances where diagnosis and treatment were conducted with limitations, but with diagnosis and treatment backed by insurance, outstanding medical treatment that is not limited by restrictions should be implemented. Therefore, in the case of unrestricted diagnosis and treatment, the medical expenses above those that the patients are asked to pay should be included in the diagnosis and treatment covered by insurance. As long as such a system is not put into place, it will be inevitable that we doctors have to practice medicine while consulting with the pockets of an impoverished national government and the idea of unrestricted diagnosis and treatment will be only hot air.”
     This quotation supports completely my previous description.

 Hikari, Issue 22, August 13, 1949
translated by cynndd